KAMPALA: Exactly 35 years after Idi
Amin expelled 70,000 Indians from Uganda, thousands more are amazingly flocking
here every year straight from India and once again colonising vast swathes of
this country’s economy. But this time round they’re taking out
unprecedented political ‘insurance’ against a repeat of the 1972
pogrom.
Many say the Ugandan Indians’ brand new strategy of
entering political life and making friends with black leaders of every political
hue across the heavily Indian-populated three-country swathe of East Africa
Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania may literally be a lifeline.
On April 12,
riots broke out in the heart of the Ugandan capital after a recently-arrived
Indian salesman Devang Rawal was stoned to death by a black mob, which was
protesting against an Indian sugar firm’s plan to develop part of a
protected rainforest.
Though much of the outside world saw the riots and
Rawal’s murder as a gruesome re-run to the dark days of 1972,
Uganda’s newly-reestablished, largely prosperous 18,000-strong Indian
community insists this is only half the story. They say the world has changed
and with it, much of Uganda and the Indians themselves.
Says Mahesh
Wadhwani, who left India in 1994 and now owns Mima Fashions, a company
specialising in business suits: "We know we have to support this country, we
have to support the locals, we don’t have to be harsh on them."
Wadhwani’s reference is to a key complaint against the
Indians’ alleged cruel mistreatment of black Ugandans before August 7,
1972, when Amin gave them 90 days to leave with one suitcase and $100 each.
After thousands returned under a forgive-forget and financial
reparation deal offered by Museveni’s government from 1988, and many
others arrived direct from India, the Indians were more wary, less arrogant and
more polite.
Says Patrick, a black Ugandan student, "Before, the Asians
used to treat us blacks so badly, we couldn’t understand why. Now they are
better-behaved but they still don’t let us marry their daughters. A black
man can marry an English, American, Canadian or any other woman — never an
Indian."
Adds Sanjiv Patel, 40-something, leading light of the
1000-member strong Indian Association of Uganda: "The new generation of Indians
coming from India are very different from the old. They just would not call a
black man a kala to his face. They know what is acceptable behaviour and what is
not."
But that is only one part of change. In a significant break
with the past, says Patel, "We are now looking at politics even though we have
traditionally focused on economics not politics. So, we have a very good
relationship with President Museveni and his governing National Resistance
Movement."
Interestingly, Patel claims his association is the only
one in East Africa that can speak up for Indians. In Kenya, he says, "The Indian
association is the Hindu Council and Tanzania has no Indian body."
Uganda’s Indian Association, therefore, is piously playing the good
politics.
"We want people who matter to know we ’re active and
we’re concerned," says Patel. This extends to the realpolitik of elections
and party affiliation. Last year, the Ugandan parliament welcomed its first
Asian, 34-year-old Sanjay Tanna, who refused Museveni’s request to take an
NRM ticket and instead fought the election as an independent. Meanwhile, another
Indian, Parminder Singh Marwah cannily accepted the President’s nomination
for the elected party post of deputy national treasurer.
As a sign
of affectionate regard, Museveni bestowed the tribal name
‘Katongole’ on Marwah. And Tanna, who proudly says he speaks a host
of African languages "Swahili, Japadohola fairly well also understand Samai and
Lugishu and basically most of the Bantu languages" along with English and Hindi,
is proud to claim two tribal names.
But there is a jarring note in
this African-Asian rhapsody. Underneath the bonhomie, the Indians appear still
to want a get-out clause.
Says Gopalan, another Indian from India,
"We just cannot understand why the Indian government has given dual nationality
to NRIs in UK, US, Dubai etc but not Uganda".
Patel, who holds an
American passport, while his wife, mother and father have British, Indian and
Ugandan passports respectively, admits he would only acquire Ugandan nationality
if he could have another as well. "Yes, it is true we want a get-out clause,
just in case. But frankly, I don’t think we’ll need it again."
(To be continued)